Journal Entry #3

1. I believe he means that that the student must prove to the university that they are able to be part of the university by showing that they have the aptitude in their writing to speak as a professor. If a student is able to speak like a professor and is able to in a way invent the aura of the university in their writing they are able to show the university they will be a benefit to the university not a hindrance.
2. He is saying that the students should write like they are a valued asset to the university and that they are capable of giving productive input the university as if they were part of the staff of instructors. The student should be able to win over the university's admissions staff by making them think they don't only qualify as a student, but that they belong as part of the university.
3. He states that the first paper is not as eloquent as the second paper. Also the he states that the second paper is much more creative and conscious of the writing at hand.